Click the red X in your browser to close this page and return to our web site.
Mitigation of Visible Fungal Contamination in Buildings: Experience From 1993 -
1998
Philip r. Morey, P.H.d., Daryl Sawyer, B.s. AQS Services, Inc,. 2235
Baltimore Pike, Gettysburg, PA
Experience in the early 1990’s led to the recommendation that removal of visible
fungal growth from interior surfaces in buildings be performed in a manner that
minimized the dispersion of particles (dusts) in indoor air. Several documents
beginning with the 1994 New York City Guidelines on Assessment and Remediation
of Stachybotrys atra in Indoor Environments provided practitioners with
procedures that can be used to remove visible fungal growth from building
interiors. All fungal remediation guidelines recommend that sustained and
extensive fungal growth on interior surfaces should be physically removed and
that people performing remediation work should use appropriate personal
protective equipment. In addition, all guidelines published in 1993-1998
recommend that moisture problems in building infrastructure be fixed in order to
prevent new fungal growth. Fungal remediation guidelines specify a certain
surface area of visible fungal growth (generally 3 to 10m2) that requires
containment barriers similar to those used when hazardous chemical or physical
materials are removed from buildings. Misunderstanding of 1993-1998 guidelines
has resulted in both overly conservative approaches to clean-up as well as to
dispersion of fungal spores throughout a building because of poor dust control.
Unlike guidelines on removal of hazardous chemical and physical agents where
rigid inspection protocols and specific numerical guidelines are appropriate,
the removal of mycobiota is a variable process depending on many factors
including the biology of the fungal taxa. Factors such as the following should
be considered during the remediation process: (a) the location, extent, and kind
of fungal growth in building systems, (b) the susceptibility of building
materials to biodeterioration, (c) the porosity of building materials, (d) the
susceptibility of occupants to bioaerosol exposure, and (e) sampling and
monitoring protocols appropriate for the fungal contaminants. Fungal remediation
in buildings continues to require a considerable degree of professional
judgement with regard to procedures appropriate for containment of dusts and for
control of the contaminant mycobiota.